The Holarchy and the Metaparadigm
Identify and discuss the hierarchical components of the body of nursing knowledge.
Define and discuss the four concepts encompassed in nursing’s metaparadigm.
Differentiate between the terms metaparadigm and metalanguage.
RUBRIC
|
Needs Improvement |
Developing |
Proficient |
Content |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 11 (11.00%) Excessively over or excessively under word limit; lack of central thesis or guiding idea; Substantial omissions of critical content; Information is inaccurate, incomplete, irrelevant or misinterpreted; No synthesis evident (too many quotations); Lacks organization and logical flow |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) – 23 (23.00%) Meets word limit; Central thesis or guiding idea sufficiently clear; Significant information required to support central thesis is present; Sufficiently accurate interpretations and synthesis of information; |
Points Range:24 (24.00%) – 34 (34.00%) Meets word limit Exceptional clarity of central thesis or guiding idea; Exceptional understanding of written sources evident in interpretation and synthesis; Logical conclusions flow from synthesized content |
Writing Mechanics |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 11 (11.00%) Distracting number of errors in English syntax; number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation & sentence structure make for difficult reading or confusion; Did not consult UTEP Writing Lab |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) – 23 (23.00%) Few number of typos in English syntax; grammar, spelling, punctuation & sentence structure; Clarity and purpose are evident; Evidence of consultation with UTEP Writing Lab |
Points Range:24 (24.00%) – 33 (33.00%) No errors or typos in English syntax; grammar, spelling, punctuation & sentence structure; Superior graduate-level writing skills |
APA Format & Organization |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 11 (11.00%) Original ideas in the narrative are not appropriately APA-referenced; Use of one citation to attempt to cover an entire paragraph, which otherwise required citation within that paragraph; Lacks organization by divisions and subdivisions; Lacks logical flow and/or difficult to read, follow, and understand; Reference page contains high number errors in the APA format |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) – 23 (23.00%) Paragraphs in the narrative appropriately referenced with few APA violations; Original ideas are cited in the appropriate space using APA format; Reference page contains few Typos |
Points Range:24 (24.00%) – 33 (33.00%) Uses divisions and subdivisions for a superior flow of ideas; Organization facilitates logical conclusion; No APA citation or format errors in narrative or in reference |
The Holarchy and the Metaparadigm
file_19
APA
Click here for further assistance on this assignment
The post The Holarchy and the Metaparadigm appeared first on Apax Researchers.