1. According to the NPR audio/reading, the case of Toby Groves is supposed to show how “we are all capable of behaving profoundly unethically without realizing it.” According to the material we read on moral psychology, how is that supposed to work? Do these explanations establish that Toby didn’t do anything wrong? If so, how? If not, do they help us understand how people like Toby can do better? What do you think about these explanations? Why?
2. According to Sandel, people usually think about justice in one of three distinct ways. What are those approaches to justice? Consider a contemporary debate about justice and show how at least two of the approaches lead to different answers. Do you think that any one of the approaches is either better or worse than the others? Why? (You don’t need a knock-down argument here, of course – I just want to know what you think.)
the kink of the second question. https://mymedia.ou.edu/media/Weekly+intro+video+for+8+29/1_weji5kxu
The post The NPR audio/reading first appeared on COMPLIANT PAPERS.