Part 2: Two Replies The primary goal of the replies is to discuss the threads by offering analysis and critiques to include specific strengths and weaknesses and other insights for consideration. Ensure the following are met: Reply to at least 2 different peer threads and address at least 1 strength and 1 weakness per reply. Each reply must be supported with at least 2 peer-reviewed sources and include 1 biblical application/integration (no more than 10% of the total response). Each reply must be 450–600 words Use proper grammar and current APA formatting. Do not submit the discussion posts as Microsoft Word documents. Instead post the primary content of your posts into the body of the discussion area since opening files is an inconvenience when the same information can be reviewed within the discussion.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111428817Links to an external site.
Cossham, A., & Johanson, G. (2019). The benefits and limitations of using key informants in library and information studies research. Information Research, 24(3), N.PAG.
Ebrahimi, B., Tavana, M., Rahmani, M., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2018). Efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis in the presence of ordinal and interval data. Neural Computing & Applications, 30(6), 1971–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2826-2Links to an external site.
Flannelly, L.T., Flannelly, K.J. & Jankowski, K.R.B. (2014) Independent, Dependent, and Other Variables in Healthcare and Chaplaincy Research, Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20:4, 161-170, DOI: 10.1080/08854726.2014.959374
Leatham, K.R. (2012), Problems Identifying Independent and Dependent Variables. School Science and Mathematics, 112: 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00155.xLinks to an external site.
Schindler, P.S. (2022). Business Research Methods 14th edition. McGraw Hill LLC. GEM of a Study.docx