Reflection on Nursing Assessment for Violence (Graded)
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this reflection is for learners to reflect on the nurse’s role in health assessment in various care settings.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 3: Describe physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual influences on an individual’s health status. (PO 1)
Due Date
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
Posts in the discussion on two different days
Total Points Possible
50 points
Directions
Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.
Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection
Best Practices include:
Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.
Enter the reflection often during the week to read and learn from posts.
Select different classmates for your reply each week.
Reflection Questions
Reflect on your current or prior practice experiences.
Paragraph One
Patients of any age, gender, cultural background or socio-economic status can be victims of violence. Consider a patient population you are currently working with or have worked with in the past. For what type of violence might they be at risk? What are some related findings that might alert you to investigate further?
Paragraph Two
Screening for signs of violence and abuse is a part of patient health history assessments. Have you observed the questions being asked by nurses or have you asked them to patients? Do you believe these screenings are typically completed in detail? Explain your answer.
Grading
To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.
RNBSN_50_Point_Reflection_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post•Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s),
•Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and
•Reflects about specified time frame indicated in question28 pts 100% ExcellentMeets all criteria: •Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s), •Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and •Reflects about specified time frame indicated 25 pts 88% GoodIncludes all three criteria but answer is not detailed. 22 pts 80% FairMeets two of three criteria 11 pts 38% PoorMeets one of three criteria 0 pts 0% MissingDoes not answer the discussion question(s).28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and
•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.14 pts 100% ExcellentReplies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion. 12 pts 88% GoodReplies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion. 11 pts 80% FairReplies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion. 5 pts 38% PoorReplies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion. 0 pts 0% MissingNo reply post to classmates or instructor.14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates ProfessionallyAll posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil, and caring, and
•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.8 pts 100% ExcellentAll posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 7 pts 88% GoodAll posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 6 pts 80% FairAll posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 3 pts 38% PoorAll posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 0 pts 0% MissingAll posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome ParticipationDuring the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different days0 pts No Points DeductedDuring the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days 0 pts Points Deducted (-5 Points)During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days0 pts
Total Points: 50