Professional blog

Even brilliant minds can find writing a scientific paper challenging, but its completion is advantageous. Scientists write papers meticulously to communicate their unique ideas and their fresh findings with the general public.

Before releasing the findings to the public, substantial time and effort are invested in conducting the necessary research. To ensure successful communication of the study, the paper must be comprehensive, logical, and factual.

Researchers use a specific language and structure in their papers to communicate their findings ethically. Once the document is completed, colleagues will discuss and comment on the freshly minted work contained within.

The Manuscript’s Structure

Scientific papers adhere to certain standards established by the scientific community in terms of structure. The publication provides information to experts in this field following this standard approach. To convey a narrative, the researcher needs to be forthright about the problem or issue that his research attempts to solve. The reader will be more likely to read the full article when the document’s substance is presented early on. A well-written paper includes a clear title, an abstract, an introduction, a section on methods, a discussion of the findings, and a list of references. It is now widely accepted that all of the components of a journal article should be arranged logically.

Format of a Research Paper

A scientific manuscript’s structural contents are listed below.

The importance of titles cannot be overstated. When a reader comes across your work, the first thing they notice is the title. A title cannot be emphasized since it exposes your reader to the topic you want to cover in the following thousand or more words. A badly designed title may deter a prospective reader from reading deeper into your work.

Furthermore, your article is indexed in a certain way that search engine algorithms will monitor. Keywords should be highlighted to get to the top of the search index. The size of your audience and the ultimate success of your work may be determined by the title you choose.

The abstract is a condensed version of your text. The main premise of your study and the questions you aim to answer should be included within the abstract’s format. A brief description of the techniques used to accomplish your objectives and a condensed version of the findings are also provided in the abstract’s context. Because the abstract may be the only portion of the paper that is read, it should be considered a condensed version of the whole text.

The introduction expands on some of the abstract’s points. The reason for the study is given in the body of the introduction. Background information is provided, explaining why the study conducted is essential and the research’s direction. This section includes a short explanation (in a few words) of the technical elements of the experimental method used to achieve the article’s stated findings. The beginning, if well-written, will entice readers to read the rest of the article.

The opening should be three to five paragraphs in length, and the author should keep in mind that this is not a review article. There should also be a coherent flow of thoughts that leads to the purpose statement. Finally, the reader must be able to see the question that is being addressed. The background for the issue should be apparent in these opening lines, and its significance should be emphasized. Finally, the reader should be able to see evidence for a particular hypothesis or hypothesizes.

• Materials and Methodology

The technical elements of the study are fully discussed in this section. This section of the text must be as clear as possible. This area will inform other researchers of the techniques and materials you used to verify, replicate, and/or further develop the ideas. Detailed procedures, akin to a road map, are given here, describing the tests carried out, the agents or technologies employed, and any biology involved. This is where you should provide your statistical analysis and testing. Nothing in this section of the text should be approximated. If too many approximations are found, suspicion may be thrown in your way, leading to questions about the research’s validity.

The methods section is crucial for other scientists to understand what you performed and duplicate your research. As a result, you must be extremely explicit about the equipment you use, where you got it, and how you used it and give clear references to techniques. Make careful to utilize subheadings sparingly and strive for a logical flow in your techniques section that corresponds to the experiment’s real flow.

You must include comments about informed consent and Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee approval of any human or animal research study. Ascertain that all human subjects have been informed of the research’s hazards before being given a chance to offer written informed consent.

Start with the “Approach to the Problem” part in this section, which explains how your experimental design will be able to test the hypothesis established in the introduction. You’ll need to explain why you choose your independent and dependent variables and expand on those ideas throughout the techniques section.

Probably the most important part of the text in this section. Explain the data using tables and graphs so you can communicate the essence of the study and the results. It is important to discuss the interpretation of the results, the consequences of the results, and possible future studies following a thorough discussion of the results. As a section, you should review the ambiguous results of this type of study and discuss the ongoing debates.

This concludes the manuscript. The conclusions are stated in a concise manner using words rather than numbers. Specifically, this section should contain information gathered from the research conducted. This section should not contain any references. You must explain your results thoroughly and comprehensively in this section of the paper. Clarity of thinking is also necessary since misunderstanding the findings is always a risk. Comparing work in your area to similar work in other areas is permitted here. Do not interpret your findings in a way that is not backed up by your research.

Submission guidelines vary from journal to journal. Journal standards require references to be authenticated. Creating references can be done in a variety of ways. It would be best if you familiarized yourself with them. It is also advisable to include the references in the order in which they appear in the text. Parentheses are typically included following the phrase where a number is mentioned.

Write a scientific paper to present your study to a large audience. A study of this complexity must be reported clearly and simply in a way that meets current publishing guidelines and can be verified. This article includes recommendations for how the researcher can present his findings effectively. Your study should always be the basis for your writing. If you follow these guidelines, your scientific paper will succeed.

Tips for Getting Your Manuscript Published Faster

Experiments must be carefully designed, optimized, and replicated for research to be successful. When you’ve gathered enough information to create a book, you’ll probably want to publish it as quickly as possible. Rapid publishing may help researchers disseminate their results faster, reduce the risk of being scooped, and get back to work on the next project faster. Whether you’re doing research or writing, the following pointers may help you publish more quickly:

Mind your figures

The time spent repeating work to acquire more comprehensive or presentable data is reduced when important studies are designed with publication in mind, including the appropriate controls and formatting. Consider writing your figures early since this procedure may become more time-consuming and intimidating if weeks or months have gone since you gathered the data. AJE’s academic illustration services are also an excellent place to go for help with figure formatting or bespoke illustration production, particularly if you’re short on time.

Begin writing as soon as possible

Even if you don’t have all of your experiments completed, you may start writing your paper right now. Prewriting works especially well for the background/introduction portion, which is usually based on previous research. It is also possible to speed up manuscript preparation by writing the materials and methods section while the protocols are still fresh in your memory.

Make sure you write clearly

Unfortunately, poor language may stymie the publication of well-designed research with important consequences. Editors and reviewers, in particular, may struggle to comprehend the material and may have a negative prejudice towards badly written submissions, making rejection more probable. For non-native English speakers, this is a challenging hurdle to overcome. Consider asking your colleagues for feedback on your work, consulting AJE’s Author Resource Center for editing suggestions, and/or utilizing AJE’s editing or translation services for assistance with your writing.

Make use of reference management software

This kind of software may be used to save important references, reducing the amount of time spent looking for articles you’ve already read. Furthermore, while working on a paper, reference managers may style your citations according to the target journal’s standards and automatically update your reference list anytime you add or delete a citation, saving you time. Zotero, for example, is a free piece of software.

Know when it’s time to submit

Consider if your study can be divided into two distinct tales if you already have a lot of data but are still conducting trials. This method will enable older research to be published sooner, even before subsequent ones are completed.

Seek peer review before publishing

Using a peer review service like Peerage of Science or Axios before submitting to a journal may help speed up the process. You may also use our free developmental editing template to receive input on the strength of your work from your peers. You may avoid some of the concerns of journal reviewers if you get this input before you publish.

Select the appropriate journal

Select a publication whose breadth is a suitable match for your research topic to improve your article’s chances of acceptance. This may be accomplished by consulting with peers, checking your own reference list, and reading journal websites and current tables of contents. You could also look at journals and publishers (like Elsevier) who prefer a faster turnaround between submission and judgment. Submitting to open access journals like PeerJ and PLOS ONE (advertised as “accelerating the publishing of peer-reviewed science”), which prioritize scientific quality above novelty and importance, may help speed up publication even further.

Make contact with the journal

A pre-submission inquiry is a letter sent to a publication to assess its interest in your article before submitting it. Without going through the full submission and peer review procedure, this inquiry may help you quickly assess if your article is a suitable match for the journal. Different journals may have different criteria for the substance of these requests; for example, Current Biology asks that you submit your letter together with the abstract of your article. It’s worth noting that a pre-submission inquiry may be needed in certain circumstances, such as when contemplating publishing in PLOS Medicine.

Follow the instructions

To minimize needless delays in publishing, adhere to the target journal’s requirements for the cover letter, main text, references, figures and tables, and any additional material. AJE’s manuscript formatting service may help you adhere to these rules.

Compose a compelling cover letter

The cover letter that goes with your submission gives you the chance to emphasize the importance of your work to the journal and highlight your main results. An excellent cover letter submitted to the right magazine may persuade the editor to send your article out for evaluation right away.

Keep track of your journal

If you submitted your article to a journal but have yet to hear back, you should contact the editor to inquire about the status of your submission. Because the time it takes for a journal to make a decision varies by field and journal, you may wish to check with colleagues or go to the journal’s website to see whether you’ve been waiting longer than normal.

Efficiently respond to critics

Responding to editors’ and reviewers’ remarks in a comprehensive, concise, and courteous manner can assist in minimizing the chance of rejection or the second round of review, saving you time.