Based on the lectures and Nagels book chapter, explain in your own words:
(i) Why does knowledge need to be (at a minimum) justified true belief, and not simply true belief? (ii) What is the Gettier argument that shows that justified true belief is not an adequate definition of knowledge? (iii) Explain one attempt to overcome the Gettier argument, and the main objection to that attempt.
Note 1: do not cite the lectures or the lecture slides / mind map. Instead, cite
the relevant part of the assigned readings, or some secondary literature.
Note 2: The questions are in the form of (i), (ii), and (iii) to help you understand what is required and to see the expected structure. Your response should be in the form of an essay, not numbered exam answers.
Your paper should not be longer than 1500 words
You will find attached:
-The grading scale
-The ppt of the class
-The Nagel’s book chapter
- Why does knowledge need to be (at a minimum) justified true belief, and not simply true belief? (ii) What is the Gettier argument that shows that justified true belief is not an adequate definition of knowledge? (iii) Explain one attempt to overcome the Gettier argument, and the main objection to that attempt.
- Attaining Data Integrity
- God Command Theory of Ethics
- Black movements in the 1960s (black panther party)
- EHR Digital Resource
- Using the System Development Life Cycle
- Using Technology in Healthcare
- How does Foucault describe the way power in organized in society in modern times? 3. How does race, class, and gender impact Black women’s feeling of power in society according to Patricia Hill Collins? 4. According to Gloria Anzaldua, how does language shape cultural and social identity?
- America and the Rise of Neopopulism in the 21st Century
- Does P&G report any intangible assets, especially goodwill, in its 2017 financial statements and accompanying notes?