Compare Max Webers theory of inequality to that of Karl Marx. For full credit make sure you discuss all of the following: Webers view of life-chances as based on (a) class, (b) status, and (c) party and compare/contrast to Marx theory of inequality as class conflict based on the relationship between the (d) capitalists (bourgeoisie) and (e) proletariat (working class). Conclude with a statement regarding which theory you think is most relevant to understanding contemporary US society

Instructions: Answer any two (2) of the following essays with as much relevant detail as possible. Each essay should be approximately 1.5 – 2 pages, for a total of 3-4 pages (double-spaced, college standards)

Compare Max Webers theory of inequality to that of Karl Marx. For full credit make sure you discuss all of the following: Webers view of life-chances as based on (a) class, (b) status, and (c) party and compare/contrast to Marx theory of inequality as class conflict based on the relationship between the (d) capitalists (bourgeoisie) and (e) proletariat (working class). Conclude with a statement regarding which theory you think is most relevant to understanding contemporary US society

Compare/contrast Webers work on religion to that of Durkheim. For full credit, make sure you address all of the following: Webers theoretical argument regarding Calvinist Protestantism as a complement to the development of capitalism, in terms of (a) the idea of predestination and its relationship to (b) asceticism and (c) how this spurred capital investment. Compare this to Durkheims emphasis on religion as the collective recognition of (d) the sacred and how this was a source of (e) integration and regulation for the community.

Analyze the events of January 6th (the assault on the US capitol) using Webers theory of political power. For full credit: (a) define Webers concept of power, (b) define Webers concept of party (c) define Webers concept of authority. Now, explain the events surrounding January 6th using the two (d-e) of Webers ideal-types of authority that you think are most relevant to understanding this event. The readings will be below

READING (you will have to read chapters 2,3, and 4 in order to answer the following questions)
PAY EXTRA CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING PAGES
pp. 26-27
pp. 128-136
pp. 127-128
PP 147-151

READING
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g0uqAiWgvPE2As7BLgv_h_BsjIY7ADk4/view?usp=sharing

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZTtQ-RWTZE

RECENT ASSIGNMENTS

  • US History After Civil War E1
  • What is the relevance of the distinction that C. W. Mills established between troubles and issues? [In other words, why does such a distinction matter, or should matter?
  • Does the U.S. need the ERA today? Why or Why not?
  • Why: This essay assignment requires you to use the critical thinking standards you learned about in chapters 7 and 8. As such it meets six of the learning objectives for PHR 100 Reasoning: (1) identify and summarize the qualities, attitudes, and goals of the critical thinker; (2) identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments occurring in natural language; (3) demonstrate knowledge of the principles of good reasoning; (4) detect and identify faulty and fallacious reasoning; (5) locate, evaluate, and use effectively information from a variety of relevant sources; (6) produce good arguments, using clear, logical, and concise language, both in speaking and in writing.
  • Quantitative Statistics (SPSS) Assignment
  • Compare Max Webers theory of inequality to that of Karl Marx. For full credit make sure you discuss all of the following: Webers view of life-chances as based on (a) class, (b) status, and (c) party and compare/contrast to Marx theory of inequality as class conflict based on the relationship between the (d) capitalists (bourgeoisie) and (e) proletariat (working class). Conclude with a statement regarding which theory you think is most relevant to understanding contemporary US society
  • political science
  • Defense of Premises Sections: in which you argue or offer support for the different premises of your argument. You dont need to offer an argument or paragraph of support for every premise, but certainly for those premises which might be controversial, confusing, or that you are not taking as uncontroversial background assumptions.
  • This paper is an argument analysis
  • Walmart’s managers conduct merchandising audits to determine whether company guidelines are being met regarding product pricing, display/setup accuracy, assortment/selection, and other factors.
Reference no: EM132069492

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments? We are here

GRAB 25% OFF YOUR ORDERS TODAY

X