Sample Answer for NURS 6512 I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Included After Question
I-HUMAN PATIENTS CASE STUDY: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT
Throughout this course, you have reviewed Learning Resources on various body systems and completed i-Human Patients Assignments for particular systems. For this i-Human Patients Assignment, you connect the knowledge and skills you gained from each individual assessment to perform a comprehensive head-to-toe physical examination.
Note: You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign an i-Human Patients case for this Assignment. Note: Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your i-Human Patients Assignment.
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Also review Learning Resources from previous weeks as needed.
Access and review this week’s i-Human Patients Case Study Assignment.
Assignment
As you interact with this week’s i-Human Patients patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human Patients, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the i-Human Patients platform.
Note: You must achieve a total score of at least 80% in order to pass this Assignment. You must pass the Week 9 Assignment to pass the course. Carefully review the Assignment and the rubric to be sure you fully understand the requirements of this Assignment.
By Day 7 of Week 9
Upload your PDF from i-Human Patients to submit this Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6512_Week 9_Assignment_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome History: Complete an appropriate health history. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)20 pts ExcellentAchieves a score of 90–100% 15 pts GoodAchieves a score of 80–89% 10 pts FairAchieves a score of 70–79% 5 pts PoorAchieves a score of 60–69% 0 pts UnsatisfactoryAchieves a score of 59% or below20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Physical Exam: Complete an appropriate physical exam. (Scores are automatically calculated in the i-Human platform.)20 pts ExcellentAchieves a score of 90–100% 15 pts GoodAchieves a score of 80–89% 10 pts FairAchieves a score of 70–79% 5 pts PoorAchieves a score of 60–69% 0 pts UnsatisfactoryAchieves a score of 59% or below20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation History of Present Illness: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation Subjective Data Document Current Medications, Review of System: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Subjective findings only10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome EMR Documentation Objective Data Document Physical Exam Findings: 5 criteria: 1.) Complete; 2.) Accurate; 3.) Written in Professional Language; 4.) Pertinent to the Chief Complaint; 5.) Includes Objective findings only10 pts ExcellentComplete HPI meeting all 5 criteria. 8 pts Good4 requirements are met. 6 pts Fair3 requirements are met. 4 pts Poor1–2 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Key Findings: Organize the key findings with the most important first and least important last.5 pts ExcellentThe key findings are complete and appropriately organized. 4 pts GoodThe key findings are complete but the organization is not correct. 3 pts FairThere are 1–2 key findings missing or organized inappropriately. 2 pts PoorThere are 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryThere are more than 3 key findings missing and organization is incorrect.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Statement: Document a brief and accurate problem statement using professional language that includes the following: 1.) Name or initials, age; 2.) Chief complaint; 3.) Positive and negative subjective findings; 4.) Positive and negative objective findings.5 pts ExcellentAll requirements are met. 4 pts Good3 requirements are met. 3 pts Fair2 requirements are met. 2 pts Poor1 requirement is met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Management Plan: Use the expert diagnosis provided to create a pertinent, comprehensive, evidenced-based management plan. Address the following criteria in the plan: 1.) Diagnostic tests; 2.) Medications (write out a complete order, even for OTC meds); 3.) Suggested consults/referrals; 4.) Patient education; 5.) Follow-up, including time interval and specific symptoms to prompt a return visit sooner; 6.) Provide rationales for each intervention and include references to support your plan. Clinical practice guidelines should be utilized as applicable.15 pts ExcellentAll requirements are met. 13 pts Good5 requirements are met. 10 pts Fair4 requirements are met. 7 pts Poor1-3 requirements are met. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryNo requirements are met.15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References and Format: Current APA citations for references in management plan. Use of clinical practice guidelines when applicable.5 pts Excellent0–1 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable. 4 pts Good2–3 errors Clinical practice guidelines used when applicable. 3 pts Fair4–5 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable. 2 pts Poor6–7 errors Clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable. 0 pts UnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors; clinical practice guidelines not used when applicable.5 pts
Total Points: 100